RECONCILING SURVIVAL WITH SALVATION
The cliché that unfolds like a smoke from the chimney of
many places is that the means justifies the end. Yet, the question remains
whether a moral high ground should always be pursued when trying to evaluate
what type of means leads to an end?
To many the crave for survival from a
difficult situation most times leads to a relegation of moral standards which
in itself means many do not bother about salvation when it comes to the issue
of survival. This has fostered a situation where many pursue a means that is
not pure to achieve their desired end. That is one side of the coin. The other
side of the coin is a situation where a person finds himself in a situation
which he cannot explain, as the scenario below depicts.
A man gets both his limbs amputated as a result of an
accident. When you approach him by saying, give your life to Christ and you
would have the opportunity of walking with Jesus in heaven. For a man that just lost his limbs, telling him about walking seems fanciful at best at such a moment.
The realist in the
amputee, first and foremost is to survive and where possible put is life back
on track, and most probably not a narrative on salvation. Though, the state of
mind of such a person ultimately determines whether he would readily take the
salvation narrative to heart. No doubt to a realist the first instinct is
pursuing a course of survival, but one who has the graces to see beyond it
would embrace salvation in spite of the complicated nature of such a situation.
Coming down to a more common appraisal in daily life is
this: There are many in the society today who are jobless. And they find
themselves in a forlorn situation. Most persons in such situation pursue a
survival first instinct before salvation comes into play. To this extent they
often pursue any road of survival whether or not it furthers the cause of moral
insolvency. It is not unusual to see many engage in many nefarious activities
all in a bid to survive thereby relegating salvation to the back burner.
Though, from the parlance of divinity, it is never a good
thing to sacrifice salvation at the altar of survival. Yet, many in today's
society do not care. All they concern themselves about is to irk out a
living.
Yet, this is not to say that there are no persons who do not
see salvation as a first option no matter the situation.
Why there is never a justification for engaging in
activities that is against morality and law when trying to survive, a question
however springs to mind, would the society blame a person who steals to satisfy
is hunger?
Islamic Law provides a window of escape in such situation. It exempts
a person who steals because of hunger from the prescribed punishment of
stealing. Most people that steal for hunger are usually amoral; choosing
instead to satisfy their belly before bearing what consequences awaits them.
Yet stealing for whatever reason is immoral.
The cliché that the quickest way to a man's loyalty is
through his belly hold sway. Which means many will prioritize their personal needs
via trying to survive. This is were survival comes into it. The reality is
that many people cannot attain stability in their lives if their very survival
is threatened by a lack of the basic things of life.
When trying to a draw a line between salvation and survival,
many in the society today, wants to survive first before they seek salvation.
In reality, you cannot blame such a person who assumes that position by being judgmental. Because in hindsight, it is difficult to say to
a man who has not eaten anything for days, that he should give his life to
Christ and that God will put food on his table. For such a man, at that moment,
such narrative is illogical to him. It is survival first, and giving such a
person food at the first instance eventually makes the salvation message to be
readily acceptable.
Jesus Christ recognized this while on earth through the
miracle of the five loaves and two fishes after teaching the multitude that
where gathered.
Without doubt the nature of a society vis-à-vis the standard
of living determines how people approach these two issues. There will always be
persons who will do anything to survive whether it defeats morals before they
countenance salvation.
It takes the graces to seek salvation in a path of
labyrinth.
Some will say salvation can be sought at anytime as survival
is it first, even when the eyes might close and never opens by which time
salvation becomes eternally impossible.